top of page

MODULE 3
Surface VS Pattern

analyses

Screen Shot 2022-05-04 at 03.19.43.png

deliverables

Screen Shot 2022-05-04 at 02.59.37.png
Screen Shot 2022-05-04 at 03.01.10.png

+

=

Screen Shot 2022-05-04 at 03.01.21.png

the hybrid

Screen Shot 2022-05-04 at 03.01.56.png

fabrication drawings of the hybrid

Screen Shot 2022-05-04 at 03.01.29.png
2022_SM1_MendozaEvetteAnne_1337688_M33DModelM5Version [Converted].png
Screen Shot 2022-05-04 at 03.01.29.png

the artefact

The Artefact.png

Artefact
renders

Photostage.png
test Photostage.png

the composite

FoDR M3 Composite.png

Reflection

The idea behind this module was to explore the relationship between pattern and surface and work towards being fluent with the fabrication process. Throughout the duration of completing this assignment, it was highly enjoyable, although at times tedious.

​

The original painting contained the black and gold fabric that acted as a juxtaposition to the turquoise blue fabric, however, it read
as flat looking. Thus the main idea behind the grid, panel and hybrid studies as well as the artefact and composite was to mainly highlight the pattern and implied form of the blue turquoise fabric. It allowed for room to interpret the flow and opportunities for extension in the artefact.

​

By first taking the time to analyse the sample and terrain, the deliverables of this assignment could be better envisioned. However patience and resourcefulness was a key component when work- ing with Rhino to complete them. As a first time user, the resources made available were highly beneficial, especially when completing the grid, panel and hybrid studies. Unfortunately, the laptop used for this assignment could not support the Ray Traced rendering process, thus the alternative Rendered view was utilised for the final submission.

​

Compiling all the isometric snapshots, rendering, and the Adobe Suite documents was a time consuming process but as always, a rewarding experience to view the final product.

bottom of page